Presentation

Ethan

• The language section is well done.

• Occasionally, there are grammar issues and lengthy sentences, which can be tiring to read.

• The title page is well designed.

• The sudden transitions between white and black make the site slightly painful to look at at certain times.

Magnus

• Home Economics

  • Creative/clear main page.

  • The 1st article goes straight to the point and is very engaging to the audience.

  • Text in the 2nd article is big, bright, and hurts my eyes.

  • I love how short it takes to read the articles; it keeps the reader interested.

• Music

  • The main page is visually appealing.

  • Articles cover topics not covered in raw materials, making them unique.

  • The text in articles 2 & 3 share the same photo.

  • It's nice that extra information is shared, given the author's experience in concert band.

  • Music articles seem to be getting less detailed after each one, lacking depth compared to home economics articles.

  • Overall, clean design, engaging text, great picture quality.

Matthew

• Home Economics

  • Glazed the home economics teacher so hard the background of his website went black.

  • Works are not detailed but descriptive, showcasing a quick and efficient approach.

  • Background may be bland, but it adds to the soothing and calming nature of the articles.

  • Many photos in articles bring life into the words and help readers understand and emphasize with the wise words.

• Music

  • More detailed than other subjects due to access to exclusive photos and knowledge in music.

  • Background may be a bit bland, but it adds to the soothing and calming nature of the articles.

  • Works are not detailed but descriptive, showcasing a quick and efficient approach.

  • Many photos in articles bring life into the words and help readers understand and emphasize with the wise words.

Kush

• Home Economics

  • Creative design.

  • Informative articles.

  • Colors mesh well.

  • Integrative elements are strong.

  • Theme of the page is conveyed well.

  • Smooth transitions.

  • Could be interpreted as tacky.

  • Different names other than “story 1, story 2, story 3, story 4” could be considered.

  • Creative design might look out of place.

• Music

  • Creative image buttons that help expand the image.

  • Unique comment section.

  • Nice image choice.

  • Background does not fit.

  • Articles could be more informative and in-depth.

  • Buttons could be integrated in a more creative manner.

  • Home economics weaknesses include waffling.

  • Unsure what to include in one section.

Howard

• Home Economics

  • Liked the fitting style, suggests clearer fonts and image edits.

  • Minor grammatical mistakes in articles, recommends a back-to-main-page button.

• Music

  • Main page background fits, some fonts could be clearer.

  • High-quality and standout images, but image blurring is slow and annoying.